Skip to content

In Which Poo(h) is Entirely Surrounded by Water*

October 31, 2012

A marine coprolite (reptile or fish) from Paleocene? rocks at Big Muddy Lake, Saskatchewan (The Manitoba Museum, specimenV-2388)

The subject of this piece is, literally, old crap, as a change from the metaphorical version that some people might think occupies this page at other times.

A few weeks back, I saw a specimen labelled as a coprolite, a fossilized piece of dung. It wasn’t stated what the coprolite had been extruded by, but the implication was that it was from the back end of a dinosaur (and was therefore, perhaps, exciting). Even from a quick glance it was clear that this was unlikely, as this dropping had obviously been deposited in water, not on land.

Fossil feces, when you think about it, can carry a variety of signatures. They can tell us about the diet of the animal, either from visible enclosed material such as bone bits, or from chemical signatures preserved in the dung. They can tell us about the intestines of the producer, if these have a distinctive form (for example, shark excrement has characteristic spiral markings produced by ridges in the creatures’ intestines). And finally, coprolites can tell us a lot about their environment of deposition.

This possible fish coprolite from Cretaceous rocks at Chain Lakes, Manitoba, is filled with fish scales and spines (MM V-2453).

Most obviously, the simple presence of ancient manure indicates that conditions permitted organic matter to lie around until it was buried and preserved. Normally, of course, dung disintegrates and decomposes; otherwise, we would be up to our necks in it pretty quickly. So its presence suggests perhaps that conditions were too dry for rotting to take place, that burial was so rapid that there was not sufficient time for decomposition, or that special local conditions prevented the growth of microbes.

The shape of the coprolite can tell us whether the turd had been moved at all in the environment, and of course it will demonstrate the effects of gravity. Which brings us back to the well-formed poop I mentioned at the top of this piece. That stool showed little effect of gravitational pull, having the three-dimensional “piped icing” shape that only seems to be associated with dung deposited under water.

A large coprolite from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Utah, thought to have been produced by a theropod dinosaur (MM V-3106).

Dinosaur coprolites can be difficult to identify, but those that are recognized  seem to most often take on a couple of basic forms, both of which show evidence of pervasive gravitation. Some examples, attributed to meat-eating theropods, look rather like immense dog turds, with clear forms and often containing abundant bone fragments. Coprolites thought to come from plant-eating sauropods are also huge and look somewhat similar to gargantuan cowpats, evidence of their originally high fluid content (bleah).

This coprolite (external view and polished section) is part of a mass thought to have been produced by a sauropod (MM V-3105).

Dinosaur fossils in western North America are often found in river floodplain deposits, but water was where their dead bodies ended up, not where they lived. And where they lived was generally where they excreted.

* If you can’t quite place the title reference, please look at this link.

© Graham Young, 2012

13 Comments leave one →
  1. Peter Lee permalink
    November 1, 2012 4:43 am

    Hi Graham
    Neat! A little different…. enjoyed reading the article…. are there any examples of fossil poop from the Ordovician to Devonian?… I imagine probably quite small in size….. from phyllocarids/trilobites/eurypterids etc….

    • Graham permalink*
      November 2, 2012 1:03 pm

      Thanks, Peter. Yes, there is Early Paleozoic poop, but since it is mostly from invertebrates it is smaller and different in form. When you hear about “pelleted limestones”, some of those are largely made up of arthropod droppings.

      • Peter Lee permalink
        November 2, 2012 1:12 pm

        Thanks for the insights Graham… I am on the look out for arthropod poop : )

  2. David Greenwood permalink
    November 1, 2012 8:28 am

    Hi Graham

    With reference to that small bear in this article’s title, named as he is after your city of residence*, Winnie the Pooh and Christopher Robin have a direct link to paleontology in that they both once performed a taphonomic* experiment. They dropped sticks into a stream and watched what they did as they passed under a bridge.

    *Winnie is from Winnipeg … just in case anyone was confused as to Graham’s city’s name!

    **For the non-specialist, taphonomy is the the study of how fossil deposits form, and the quality of information about past ecology or biology that can be gleaned from the fossil record.

    • Graham permalink*
      November 2, 2012 1:04 pm

      David, this is just further evidence that you should be doing your own blog. You could probably come up with a whole series on geological processes in Winnie-the-Pooh and The House at Pooh Corner!

      • David Greenwood permalink
        November 3, 2012 1:04 am

        I could never match your superb imagery.

  3. Howard Allen permalink
    November 1, 2012 2:55 pm

    The specimen in the first photo is a dead-ringer for the Whitemud Fm. (Late Cretaceous) coprolites from near Assiniboia, Saskatchewan:

    Broughton, P.L., Simpson, F. and Whitaker, S.H. 1977. Late Cretaceous coprolites from southern Saskatchewan: comments on excretion plasticity and ichnological nomenclature. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, Vol. 25, No. 5, p. 1097–1099.

    Broughton, P.L., Simpson, F. and Whitaker, S.H. 1978. Late Cretaceous coprolites from western Canada. Palaeontology, Vol. 21, pp. 443–453.

    • Graham permalink*
      November 1, 2012 3:16 pm

      Thanks, Howard. That is quite possibly the provenance for our piece as well. That is always the danger with donated specimens, figuring out exactly where they came from.

  4. November 3, 2012 11:26 am

    Never boring !
    Interesting subject which I know nowt about – well: maybe a little, I wonder what they will make of the Guinness remnants in a million years time 🙂 Maybe I should be more careful while out camping!

    David.

    • Graham permalink*
      November 3, 2012 5:45 pm

      Thanks, David. Yes, maybe if one locates deposits as carefully as possible, then they will have a chance at fossilization!

  5. Bathmat permalink
    November 4, 2012 12:05 am

    Reblogged this on Globe-combing and commented:
    A few days ago Ancient Shore had an excellent post on copralite. There’s nothing more interesting than the shit organisms leave behind.

  6. November 11, 2012 8:23 am

    Utterly fascinating !

    • Graham permalink*
      November 11, 2012 10:50 am

      Thank you, Helen.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: